Saturday, July 30, 2016

Erdoğan after failed coup: stronger or weak



After the coup attempt in Turkey, we have been red hunderds of news or analyses about it: who organized the plot, are the plotters one sect or have some distinctions between, did US support them, which parts or Turkish Military jioned the plot, how about other parts of it etc. And even 15 days after, some questions have no answer for the ruling AKP too. 

This point is the major reason of the aggressive purges and arrests. For a superficial observation, you may think that Erdoğan is stronger than before the coup attempt because he has atrated to get ride of all opponents of him. But this is not the real scene of Turkey and Erdoğan right now. Because he could never know that who is reliable or not. Moreover, Erdoğan now know that both Turkish bourgeoise and most of imperialistic partners wait for success of the coup attempt first hours. So hard times began for Erdoğan after the "victory" of Erdoğan. In the other words, failed attempt was successful for the future as a means of control Erdoğan. 

To answer the question on the top efficiently lets go a little back on political history of AKP and Erdoğan first. After the division of the Welfare Party, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and Abdullah Gül led a new party that named Justice and Development Party, AKP. The new Party was describe itself as a "conservative democrat" party. As we red from AKP documents, conservative democracy was a kind of liberalism who survives as a muslim concept of liberalism. AKP made certain the western imperialism that she will never try to conflict with their will. Moreover, as a muslim partner, AKP could do what imperialism want for middle east and nobody could think that its a new crusade. 

Like the western imperialism, Turkish big bourgeoise saw the pottential of the AKP for their interests on the region. Not only the muslim bourgeoise named the Anatolian Tigers supported the AKP, but especially biggest capitalist holdings like Sabancı, Koç, Doğan etc. Because, in the AKP era, capitalist class gained huge benefits against working class with the laws of AKP governments. 

This two, western imperialism and Turkish big bourgeoise, was the main parts of the coalition which gived AKP to the its power. But there were one important component of the coalition: Turkish reactionism. After the 1980 coup, popularising of the political islam was a state policy. This process helped the mass sentiment for AKP. If you want to discuss about Erdoğan's strenght, you have to see its first sources clearly like this: western imperialism, Turkish bourgeoise and reactionism. 

Erdoğan was successful first years of his reign. Despite membership process of the EU, Arab Spring gived a big opportunity for him too. But with Syrian War, things have been strated the change for him as i wrote before: "So, the victory of AKP will mean that the victory of US and its imperialist allies. An the defeat of AKP will mean the stumble of US plans on Middle East." 

Now we know that new ottomanist foreign policy of Erdoğan and Davutoğlu defeated in Syria and it caused the defeat of imperialistic plans too. It was the first warning for the coalition partners of AKP. With the June uprising of 2013 in Turkey, AKP has been lost public support too. Then, the coalition which took the AKP as ruling party of Turkey, crashed quickly. 


After this point, a political/ideological crisis wrapped around the Turkey and the crisis could not solved yet. Indeed, motivation of the plotters came from there too. Turkey is not such a country and "must" be governance for capitalist class' and western imperialisms will. 

For my opinion, weakness of Erdoğan is derives from governance crisis and there is no any safe process to make Turkey stabile for future. Erdoğan has no enough staff to govern Turkey and has no enough ally to find convenient staff. The crowds on streets not able to maintain any political process but fanatic islamist mostly. Here is the catalysor of the nightmares of Erdoğan... 










Thursday, February 13, 2014

Introduction to understand the June uprising of Turkey







In the memory of Mehmet Ayvalitas, Ethem Sarisuluk, Abdullah Comert, Ali İsmail Korkmaz, Ahmet Atakan and Medeni Yildirim respectfully.

Turkey became the one of the most popular issues of world politics in last June. The struggle to secure Taksim Gezi Park in İstanbul from bulldozers sparked the uprising and the world witness to the mass revolt against Justice and Development Party (AKP) rule. The struggle took a month at least and came out “almost” whole of country[1]

In this little piece, I prefer to talk about the reasons of uprising rather than give details of clashes. How did Turkish people decide to revolt against ruling party which had % 50 votes of 2011 elections?[2] Was the matter about trees of Taksim Gezi Park or more than ecology? Of course the police raid with tear gas in the 31 May sparked off a reaction against police and it made a multiplier effect but protestors without any other motivation could not survive the demonstrations about one month.

I think there are two major reasons to explain June uprising in Turkey. First of all, foreign policy of AKP era which named “new-Ottomanism”[3] was failed in Syrian issue. Especially with Reyhanli bombings in 11 May[4] convinced Turkish people about problems of Turkish foreign policy. With the help of “imperial (big) Turkey” rhetoric, AKP could mesmerize masses. But when the Syria issue started to show inability of AKP, the magic was gone.  

The second reason of uprising is the refutation of “new Turkey”. Turkish people resisted to the transformation of the Turkey by AKP. Some policies to Islamize social life and pressure to woman caused reactions before but with the new constitution debates a new problem was emerged: Turkey is not a country such as surrender “retrogressive” transformations. There “must” be a mass resistance to second republic[5] era. So the Turkish people found a way out to struggle against AKP with Taksim Gezi Park.

This two major reasons give us the key to understand June uprising in Turkey. But I know that there are many other effective events behind the people. This two, are only the main source of motivation of the people.

An important “additional reason” to these must be problems between AKP and her allies. Turkish bourgeoisie, Islamic communities (especially Gulen movement) and of course USA were the allies behind of AKP era. But the awkwardness in the foreign policy and problems about the transformation of Turkey made AKP government more precarious for her allies. So they left AKP alone in face of mass movements in June. Without her allies support AKP became more aggressive and it helped to new faults to crisis management.

PM Erdogan saw that he was alone with problems of transformation and her allies are waiting for defeat of him. This explains why Erdogan did not retreat. If he was retreat he could be defeated by people easily. So, he decided to resist both people and her allies. But his aggressiveness caused more anger to him.

These two major and one additional reasons explains June of Turkey mainly. I will try to give details of them in my next bloggings. 



[1] For details of June of Turkey you can check Timeline page from wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_2013_protests_in_Turkey
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_general_election,_2011
[3] For more, please read my older piece about this: http://politicsofturkey.blogspot.com.tr/2011/11/arab-spring-and-turkey-us-relations.html
[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_Reyhanl%C4%B1_bombings
[5] http://politicsofturkey.blogspot.com.tr/2011/09/second-republic-of-turkey-what-is.html